The neutral marble background contrasts with the muted green and violet tones of the asparagus tip, directing attention to its subtle details.

[3]: 277–278 Art historian Carol M. Armstrong describes the work as a study in reductionism, focusing on the relationship between the painted subject and its artistic representation rather than its physical reality.

By creating a painted substitute for a missing asparagus stalk, Manet humorously explored the equivalence between real objects and their artistic representations.

In contrast, A Sprig of Asparagus focuses on a singular object and adopts a lighter palette, creating a more intimate and informal composition.

These still lifes reflect his interest in reductionist techniques, where objects are isolated to explore their formal qualities and the broader implications of representation.

[3]: 277–278 The story behind A Sprig of Asparagus has become a well-known anecdote in art history, often cited as an example of Manet’s ability to blend humor with artistic expression.