[4] He moved to the United States after World War II and was a prolific publisher of articles in the Russophone press characterized as pseudo-scientific,[5][6][7] antisemitic and anti-Ukrainian.

In a 2006 Russian-language book, Евреи в КГБ (Jews in the KGB), Vadim Abramov asserts that “[t]he source of [Alexander] Solzhenitsyn’s encyclopedic knowledge [about the history of Jewish-Russian relations] is….

For instance, the Russian language website, Central Jewish Resource, published an article by M. Leybelman on 12 October 2006[10] in which Leybelman repeats the accusation first made by Abramov and embellishes upon it: A lot of Dikiy’s books migrated to the two-volume book “Two Hundred Years Together.” Solzhenitsyn rewrote without any verification, thereby violating the immutable rule of any researcher.

Another Russian language website, Internet Jewish Club, published an undated and unattributed article,[11] apparently based on Abramov’s allegation that Solzhenitsyn plagiarized Dikiy.

This anonymous article expands on Abramov’s allegation as follows: Abramov quotes (p. 83) from Solzhenitsyn: “The ‘soldier leader’ of 1917, Boris Pozern, the commissar of the Petrocommune [Petrograd Soviet], along with Zinoviev and Dzerzhinsky, contributed greatly to the identification of the image of the Jew and the Chekist, and on September 2, 1918, he signed an appeal on the ‘Red Terror.’” Abramov comments: “Pozern was neither a Jew (German) nor a security officer—he never served in the Cheka-NKVD.” This example illustrates this perfectly: the identification of the images of the Jew and the Chekist was “helped a lot” not so much by the real Jewish Chekists, but by their “images” drawn by Shulgin or Dikiy and then replicated by the Solzhenitsyns, Shafareviches, Burovskys and others like them - there are countless of them.