The model is employed to study both quasicrystals and the Anderson localization metal-insulator transition in disordered systems.
It was first developed by Serge Aubry and Gilles André in 1980.
[1] The Aubry–André model describes a one-dimensional lattice with hopping between nearest-neighbor sites and periodically varying onsite energies.
It is a tight-binding (single-band) model with no interactions.
The full Hamiltonian can be written as where the sum goes over all lattice sites
is the amplitude of the variation of the onsite energies,
is the period of the onsite potential modulation in units of the lattice constant.
This Hamiltonian is self-dual as it retains the same form after a Fourier transformation interchanging the roles of position and momentum.
The Aubry-André metal-insulator transition happens at the critical value of
[4] While this quantum phase transition between a metallic delocalized state and an insulating localized state resembles the disorder-driven Anderson localization transition, there are some key differences between the two phenomena.
In particular the Aubry–André model has no actual disorder, only incommensurate modulation of onsite energies.
This is why the Aubry-André transition happens at a finite value of the pseudo-disorder strength
, whereas in one dimension the Anderson transition happens at zero disorder strength.
this is equivalent to the famous fractal energy spectrum known as the Hofstadter's butterfly, which describes the motion of an electron in a two-dimensional lattice under a magnetic field.
[2][4] In the Aubry–André model the magnetic field strength maps onto the parameter
Iin 2008, G. Roati et al experimentally realized the Aubry-André localization phase transition using a gas of ultracold atoms in an incommensurate optical lattice.
[5] In 2009, Y. Lahini et al. realized the Aubry–André model in photonic lattices.