F3 (classification)
[2] The location of lesions on different vertebrae tend to be associated with disability levels and functionality issues.
[4] Disabled Sports USA defined the anatomical definition of this class in 2003 as, "Have full power at elbow and wrist joints.
[5] People with spinal injuries at T6 or higher are more likely to develop Autonomic dysreflexia (AD).
The condition causes over-activity of the autonomic nervous system, and can suddenly onset when people are playing sports.
Some of the symptoms include nausea, high blood pressure, a pounding headache, flushed face, profuse sweating, a lower heart rate or a nasal congestion.
Players in some sports like wheelchair rugby are encouraged to be particularly on guard for AD symptoms.
[6] Disabled Sports USA defined the functional definition of this class in 2003 as, "Have nearly normal grip with non-throwing arm.
[10][11] From the 1950s to the early 2000s, wheelchair sport classification was handled International Stoke Mandeville Games Federation (ISMGF).
[17] The International Paralympic Committee manages classification for a number of spinal cord injury and wheelchair sports including alpine skiing, biathlon, cross country skiing, ice sledge hockey, powerlifting, shooting, swimming, and wheelchair dance.
The group most likely to try to cheat at classification were wheelchair basketball players with complete spinal cord injuries located at the high thoracic transection of the spine.
[27] A person in this class with an additional impairment in the elbow of their throwing arm may find themselves classified as F52 instead.
[11] Field events open to this class have included shot put, discus and javelin.
[30] The shot put used by women in this class weighs less than the traditional one at 3 kilograms (6.6 lb).
[31] In the United States, people in this class are allowed to use strapping on the non-throwing hand as a way to anchor themselves to the chair.
It found there was little significant difference in performance in distance between women in 1A (SP1, SP2) and 1B (SP3) in the club throw.
It found there was little significant difference in performance in distance between men in 1A (SP1, SP2) and 1B (SP3) in the club throw.
It found there was little significant difference in performance in distance between women in 1B (SP3) and 1C (SP3, SP4) in the shot put.
[40] In 1991, the first internationally accepted adaptive rowing classification system was established and put into use.
[42][43] Swimming classification is done based on a total points system, with a variety of functional and medical tests being used as part of a formula to assign a class.
Part of this test involves the Adapted Medical Research Council (MRC) scale.
These S4 swimmers are able to use their hands and wrists to gain propulsion in the water but have some limits because of lack of full finger control.
[44] S5 swimmers with spinal cord injuries tend to be complete paraplegics with lesions below T1 to T8, or incomplete tetraplegics below C8 who have decent trunk control.
Because they have minimal trunk control, their hips tend to be a bit lower in the water and they have leg drag.
Class III for people with lesions at T6-T10 and have fair balance were worth 1 point.
The system was designed to keep out people with less severe spinal cord injuries, and had no medical basis in many cases.
[46] In 1982, wheelchair basketball finally made the move to a functional classification system internationally.
While the traditional medical system of where a spinal cord injury was located could be part of classification, it was only one advisory component.
People in this class do not have more than 70 points for functionality, have normal arm pitch for throwing and use a wheelchair.
[56] One of the standard means of assessing functional classification is the bench test, which is used in swimming, lawn bowls and wheelchair fencing.
The sixth test measures the trunk extension involving the lumbar and dorsal muscles while leaning forward at a 45-degree angle.
