Giant human skeletons

Giant skeletons reported in the United States until the early twentieth century were a combination of hoaxes, scams, fabrications, and the misidentifications of extinct megafauna.

Contemporary with the whole race of men, and older than the first man, Niagara is strong, and fresh to-day as ten thousand years ago.

European settlers embraced myths of pre-Columbian settlements from the Old World, which reframed colonization as the continuation of a primordial past in which the roles of native peoples were diminished or dismissed.

[4] By the late eighteenth century, this paternalistic narrative had become strained, due in part to violence against the native peoples on the western frontier.

[5] Josiah Priest's American Antiquities, released in 1833, crystallized the idea of a lost race—mentioned in the Book of Genesis—that created the monuments of North America before being exterminated by savages.[6][3][7]: ch.

[5] In literature, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow imagined The Skeleton in Armor (now accepted to be a native leader), as a lovesick Norse Viking eloping with his "fair" and "blue-eyed" lover.

[8] Sarah Josepha Hale accompanied her The Genius of Oblivion with end notes that claim "the ancient inhabitants [buried in the mounds] were of a different race from the Indians.

"[9] Preachers taught a biblical basis for the primordial race, including connections to the lost tribes or the Nephilim, giants from the Book of Genesis.

[10]: 164  As more information was discovered about Native American cultural complexity, the lost race became increasingly described as physically superior giants.

[7]: 243  The belief became so widespread, that Abraham Lincoln referenced the lost race of giants along with extinct Mastodons when describing the age of Niagara Falls.

[2] Hundreds of newspaper articles credulously described the purported discovery of giant skeletons, sometimes with anatomical irregularities attributed to the Nephilim.

[11] Preachers, doctors, and journalists confirmed it to "belong to the genus homo" despite a standing height estimated up to twenty feet tall.

[7]: 248  Many readers embraced the skeletons as evidence of biblical history, against unpopular experts whose discoveries undermined a literal interpretation of the bible.

[1]: 251  With a rise in white literacy rates and the emergence of the cheaper penny press newspapers, there was a strong market for these tales that gave them greater impact than university scholarship.

[7]: 243  Other newspapers reported the Moberly claims as factual[13] and republished the entire story including implausible details like the researcher who, upon drinking from the skeleton's fountain, described the water as "very sweet and nice".

[20] In 2020 The Columbus Dispatch reported that archeologist, Donald Ball collected articles about giant skeletons which were purportedly found in burial mounds dating as far back as 1845.

[24] "Giant of Castelnau" refers to three bone fragments (a humerus, tibia, and femoral mid-shaft) discovered by Georges Vacher de Lapouge in 1890 in the sediment used to cover a Bronze Age burial tumulus, and dating possibly back to the Neolithic.

[27] In 2019, the Travel Channel series Code of the Wild aired an episode in which a pre-Columbian skeleton was presented that was allegedly 7 feet tall and Salasaca storytellers were interviewed that related oral traditions of giants.

Photograph of a 1902 Newspaper article. The headline reads "Giant Skeleton". The subheading reads, "Found in Bed of Sand in Northwestern Ohio-Man Was Eight Feet High." The byline reads "Bowling Green, Ohio, August 14". The body text reads, "While excavating for sand and building on the Charles Whitmer farm, WM Jones unearthed the skeleton of a gigantic man. It is in a fair state of preservation and will be preserved, as it is thought that it may have some scientific value. The skeleton was found in a sitting posture, and when the bones were placed in a horizontal position they indicated that the height of the main in life must have been over eight feet. The head is of enormous size, being 12 inches in diameter. It is believed that is the skeleton of a member a prehistoric race of giants. Further excavations will be made to see if other graves cannot be found."
A typical example of nineteenth newspaper reporting on the unfounded and disproved mound builder race theory
Photocopy of a printed newspaper article comparing the heights of various giants. Heights range from seven to eight feet among named historical giants. Heights range from seven to nine feet among prehistoric giants. The skeleton column of the table categorizes the prehistoric giants as Indian, Mexican, Mound Builder, and Prehistoric man. The Indian skeleton is attributed to San Diego, California. The two prehistoric man skeletons are attributed to Glendive, Montana, and Paso Robles, California. The mound builder skeletons are attributed to Chillicothe, Ohio; Ely, Minnesota; Portsmouth, Ohio; and Miamisburg, Ohio.
Even after the Smithsonian had proved the mound builders to be Native Americans, the popular press continued to publish accounts of the prehistoric lost race, like this table published by the Omaha World-Herald in 1900. Comparing the heights of various alleged giants (from 7 to 9 feet tall), it labels "Indian" as a separate people from "Mound Builder" or "Prehistoric".
Three bone fragments of the named "Giant of Castelnau" compared to a regular-size humerus (centre), according to Georges Vacher de Lapouge .