[1] To some, it involves "a sequence of interactions between the governments of two or more sovereign states in severe conflict, short of actual war, but involving the perception of a dangerously high probability of war".
[2] Lebow gives a breakdown of three types of international crises: With the exception of a justification of hostilities, the study of international crises assumes that neither side actually wants to go to war, but must be visibly prepared to do so.
George's book presents an overview of the process and conflicting goals of crisis management as well as many examples.
[4] He discusses a number of strategies, including: International crises tend to result in war, almost by definition; they are then remembered best not as crises but as causes of wars.
The following crises did not immediately provoke large-scale violence, but set off anger in countries: