Since some of the documents from the Whm Mswt are implicitly dated (i.e., without reference to the era), it is not always directly clear from the dateline whether a document stems from the ordinary year count of Ramesses XI or from the Whm Mswt.
The papyrus states that these documents had been bought back from the people, apparently after they had been stolen during the Suppression of the Theban High Priest of Amun, Amenhotep, which is supposed to have taken place just prior to the start of the Renaissance.
texts stem from the first wave of tomb-robbery trials which took place in year 16 and 17 of Ramesses IX.
Ambras: These additional entries on the verso are important texts in themselves and should have been included in the inventory.
From this, Peet concluded that these entries were added only after the repurchase of the papyri in year 6 of the Whm Mswt.
When the start of the Whm Mswt finally became (correctly) dated to year 19 of Ramesses XI, the texts on the verso’s of Pap.
BM 10053 and 10068 became ascribed to the part of the reign of Ramesses XI prior to his proclamation of the Whm Mswt.