"), provided "advanced revelation" beyond that discernible in the underlying Textus Receptus Greek text, believing the KJV represented the final authority in all matters of faith and practice.

[12]: 132 Ruckman distinguished between the Textus Receptus of the KJV, and the numerically fewer manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type underlying most modern New Testament versions.

Ruckman characterized those who endorse the latter as members of the "Alexandrian Cult," people who believe that while the autographs were God-inspired, they have been lost, and that therefore there is "no final, absolute written authority of God anywhere on this earth".

[13] Ruckman also wrote that the Septuagint was a hoax perpetrated by the "Alexandrian cult" under the leadership of the Church Father Origen Adamantius (as part of his Hexapla) in the 3rd century AD in order to subvert belief in the integrity of the Bible.

His mental powers are plainly demonstrated in his books, though most people do not bother to read far enough to recognize this due to the constant stream of invective that is to be found on nearly every page.

"[19] In Ruckman's words:[20] God called me to sit at this typewriter and pour forth VINEGAR, ACID, VITRIOL, AND CLEANING FLUID on the leading conservative and fundamental scholars of 1900 through 1990.

As a trichotomist, he believed human beings were composed of body, soul and spirit, arguing that mankind, made in the image of God, reflected the Trinity.

Ruckman also argued that the Trinity was typified in nature, citing examples such as water, which can exist as ice, steam, or liquid, yet remain one substance.

[21] Peter Ruckman rejected the language of begetting, such as in Psalm 2:9, to mean the eternal origin of the Son of God; he rather interpreted it to mean the incarnation of Jesus Christ.