[9][better source needed] In 2009 another one to create in Brazilian Portuguese was rejected, but this time by language committee, according to new policies to create new Wikipedia editions,[10][better source needed] with the following explanation: "Brazilian Portuguese is not a separate language.. this is a requirement.

In the same month, a JavaScript was added that forced all unregistered users to preview their edit before saving it.

Those related to Health are read more often, and articles in the Business category have the highest average author interest.

In April 2022, the European Union's East StratCom Task Force published its findings that four pro-Russian disinformation outlets (SouthFront, NewsFront, InfoRos and Strategic Culture Foundation) were referenced in 45 articles of the Portuguese Wikipedia.

[22] They wrote: On the English version of Wikipedia, there seems to be a consensus that state-sponsored disinformation sites aren't legitimate sources [...].

One can only guess whether other language versions will follow suit, but there is nothing stopping anyone from launching that debate, pointing out the English Wikipedia example as a best practice.