Ruin value

The idea was pioneered by German architect Albert Speer while planning for the 1936 Summer Olympics and published as "The Theory of Ruin Value" (Die Ruinenwerttheorie), although he was not its original inventor.

[3] When he presented the bank's governors with three oil sketches of the planned building one of them depicted it when it would be new, another when it would be weathered, and a third what its ruins would look like a thousand years onward.

With this argument Hitler also underscored the value of a durable kind of construction.Hitler accordingly approved Speer's recommendation that, in order to provide a "bridge to tradition" to future generations, modern "anonymous" materials such as steel girders and ferroconcrete should be avoided in the construction of monumental party buildings wherever possible, since such materials would not produce aesthetically acceptable ruins.

Thus, the most politically significant buildings of the Reich were intended, to some extent, even after falling into ruins after thousands of years, to resemble their Roman models.

A more modern example of intended ruins were the planned warning signs for the proposed nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain (see Human Interference Task Force), which were intended to endure for 10,000 years, and yet still convey an enduring (if negative) impression on future generations: "Keep out.

The 1936 Berlin Olympiastadion as it appeared in 1993
The Parthenon as an example of aesthetically pleasing ruins
Aerial view of the imagined ruins of the Bank of England built by Sir John Soane (1830).
Imaginary View of the Grand Gallery of the Louvre in Ruins by Hubert Robert (1796).
The model of reshaped Berlin .