Schrödinger–HJW theorem

In quantum information theory and quantum optics, the Schrödinger–HJW theorem is a result about the realization of a mixed state of a quantum system as an ensemble of pure quantum states and the relation between the corresponding purifications of the density operators.

The theorem is named after physicists and mathematicians Erwin Schrödinger,[1] Lane P. Hughston, Richard Jozsa and William Wootters.

[2] The result was also found independently (albeit partially) by Nicolas Gisin,[3] and by Nicolas Hadjisavvas building upon work by Ed Jaynes,[4][5] while a significant part of it was likewise independently discovered by N. David Mermin.

[6] Thanks to its complicated history, it is also known by various other names such as the GHJW theorem,[7] the HJW theorem, and the purification theorem.

be a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, and consider a generic (possibly mixed) quantum state

defined on

and admitting a decomposition of the form

for a collection of (not necessarily mutually orthogonal) states

Note that any quantum state can be written in such a way for some

ρ

can be purified, that is, represented as the partial trace of a pure state defined in a larger Hilbert space.

More precisely, it is always possible to find a (finite-dimensional) Hilbert space

and a pure state

{\displaystyle \rho =\operatorname {Tr} _{A}{\big (}|\Psi _{SA}\rangle \langle \Psi _{SA}|{\big )}}

Furthermore, the states

satisfying this are all and only those of the form

for some orthonormal basis

The state

is then referred to as the "purification of

Since the auxiliary space and the basis can be chosen arbitrarily, the purification of a mixed state is not unique; in fact, there are infinitely many purifications of a given mixed state.

[9] Because all of them admit a decomposition in the form given above, given any pair of purifications

, there is always some unitary operation

Consider a mixed quantum state

with two different realizations as ensemble of pure states as

are not assumed to be mutually orthogonal.

There will be two corresponding purifications of the mixed state

reading as follows: The sets

are two collections of orthonormal bases of the respective auxiliary spaces.

These two purifications only differ by a unitary transformation acting on the auxiliary space, namely, there exists a unitary matrix

, which means that we can realize the different ensembles of a mixed state just by making different measurements on the purifying system.