IMHO this article should be reviewed by a third party who can understand and validate the content.
This article could be expanded and worded in such a way as to make it more accessible to a wider audience.JByrd 01:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply] I merged (possibly crudely) what appears to be the same article burst mode, which is now a disambiguation page pointing to here.
Square wave bursting citation points at a review article, but maybe (rinzel 1987) or (bertram et al., 1995) should be added.
This is what Izhikevich cites when he mentions square wave bursters.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.96.209.234 (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]