Talk:MyRadar

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Johnson524: Polygnotus (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] While you cannot use the New York Post, because it is literally (yes, I am using that word correctly) shit, you can use Popular Science.

https://www.popsci.com/technology/car-insurance-apps/ Polygnotus (talk) 22:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/09/technology/driver-scores-insurance-data-apps.html says After this article was published, MyRadar sent a statement that it “does not collect and sell user information for the purpose of generating driving scores.” Arity subsequently confirmed that MyRadar data has not been “shared with any insurance company for any purpose,” saying that it is “used for traffic and transportation analysis, as well as advertising.”] which may or not be a lie.

Unless they have access to the developer dashboard it is impossible for an reliable source to independently verify the number of downloads on the Apple App Store (you can only see a ranking in a category) and the Microsoft Store (#339 on the most popular app list).

It is even more unlikely because the app provided free government-provided weather and radar data for the first decade of its existence.

Polygnotus (talk) 05:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] the app launched a "meteorological wedding planning service" no, perhaps a company did?