It may be considered synonymous with ignosticism (also called igtheism), a term coined in 1964 by Sherwin Wine, a rabbi and a founding figure of Humanistic Judaism.
One argument holds to the claim that definitions of God are irreducible, self-instituting relational, circular.
Michael Martin writing from a verificationist perspective concludes that religious language is meaningless because it is not verifiable.
When asserting the proposition, one can use attributes to at least describe the concept such that a cohesive idea is transferred in language.
[7] However, Theodore Drange distinguishes noncognitivism and agnosticism, describing the latter as accepting that theological language is meaningful but being noncommittal about its truth or falsity on the grounds of insufficient evidence.