[2][3] Teachers and other educational authority figures are also often thought to have a significant impact on political orientation.
Friends often, but not necessarily, have the advantage of being part of the same generation, which collectively develops a unique set of societal issues; Eric L. Dey has argued that "socialisation is the process through which individuals acquire knowledge, habits, and value orientations that will be useful in the future.
"[7] The ability to relate on this common level is what fuels and enables future ideological growth.
The impressionable years hypothesis postulates that political orientation is solidified during early adulthood.
The ways in which these two sources are interpreted often relies on the individuals specific political ideology formed by the long-term factors.
Most political scientists agree that the mass media have a profound impact on voting behavior.
One author asserts that "few would argue with the notion that the institutions of the mass media are important to contemporary politics ... in the transition to liberal democratic politics in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe the media was a key battleground.
[13][14] This trend of African Americans voting for candidates of the Democratic Party continued into the 2016 Presidential Election.
[16][17][18][19] This trend is often referred to as the Gender Gap and when combined with the tendency of women to vote for Democratic candidates, their effect on political outcomes is extremely important.
The authors concluded that “the findings support the claim that the environment (social or other) cannot be used in isolation to explain behavior differences between males and females, nor can all differences in modern political behaviors between the sexes simply be attributed to genes or presumptions about primitive man.
"[23] Political scientists also aim to understand what drives individuals to participate in the democratic process, either by voting, volunteering for campaigns, signing petitions or protesting.
This source would provide the accurate data and analysis for the 44% of Latino voters supporting George W. Bush in 2004, clarifying the voting patterns during that election.
This report would offer the statistic on Hispanic American voter turnout in the 2016 election (47.6%), providing an up-to-date and reliable source.
Latino Political Participation and Immigration Issues: The Impact of Policies on Voting Behavior.
A study focusing on the concerns of Hispanic voters, particularly their stance on immigration, and how it influences their political behavior.