Most contemporary formulations of a transcendental argument for God have been developed within the framework of Christian presuppositional apologetics and the likes of Cornelius Van Til and Greg Bahnsen.
[citation needed] So-called progressive transcendental arguments begin with an apparently indubitable and universally accepted statement about people's experiences of the world.
The TAG differs from thomistic and evidentialist arguments, which presuppose the validity of human perception and judgement when proving the existence of God.
Medieval Ash'ari Islamic theologians formulated a type of transcendental argument based on the notion that morality, logic, etc.
For al-Ashari and others, it does not make sense to argue against religion using a priori assumptions about morality or scientific probabilities when these can only be understood in light of divine revelation.
Internet Infidels co-founder Jeffery Jay Lowder has argued that the presuppositional apologetics' version of TAG is fatally flawed for numerous reasons.