[3] In the book, Osterweil argues that looting is a valid method of wealth redistribution.

[2][4] Osterweil denounces nonviolent resistance; she argues that, when non-violence is "pushed as a philosophical, moral, or religious principle, it gains a nasty, authoritarian edge."

She also denounces local politicians and political groups who advocate for limiting looting during popular rebellion.

[4] In August 2020, Bret Stephens, a columnist for The New York Times, wrote that "In Defense of Looting is not an interesting book.

'"[5] In a September 2020 review, Graeme Wood, a staff writer for The Atlantic, called the book "The Pinnacle of Looting Apologia", saying that "If the real, lasting change you wish to effect is burning society to cinders and crippling for a generation its ability to serve its poorest citizens, then I suppose I am forced to agree.