The mock jury need to decide whether a boy is guilty or not of a murder of his father with a knife based on the evidence.

The evidence prepared by the students of the course seems airtight and therefore it seems as if the jury will render him guilty of the crime.

His motives are unclear but he wants to entertain the thought that there is reasonable doubt about the guilt of the boy.

The juror who had rebelled and wanted to see the case through is revealed to be a prosecutor of the People's Republic of China.

"[4] In The Hollywood Reporter, Deborah Young comments on the ending of the movie, stating that "one can take issue with the glib final revelation about Juror No.