2004 North East England devolution referendum

Each were initially planned to be held on 4 November 2004, but on 22 July 2004 the planned referendums in North West England and in Yorkshire and the Humber were postponed, due to concerns raised about the use of postal ballots, but the referendum in North East England was allowed to continue, particularly as it was assumed that the region held the most support for the proposed devolution.

The defeat marked the end of the Labour Government's policy of devolution for England, and the other proposed referendums for the North West and for Yorkshire and the Humber were dropped indefinitely.

The campaign against the proposed Assembly was successfully led by local businessman John Elliott,[1] who argued that the institution would have no real powers and that it would be a "white elephant" and too centric to Newcastle upon Tyne.

The draft bill proposed the following structure: The draft bill would have given the assemblies the following powers: The creation of regional assemblies was to be tied to abolition of the existing two-tier structure for local government in these regions; and its replacement with a uniform system of unitary authorities.

This recommendation was broadly (with one minor alteration in West Lancashire) accepted by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

that the regional power would have been concentrated in an Assembly situated in Newcastle upon Tyne,[citation needed] which given the strong historic rivalries between urban centres in the North-East may have caused resentment from the people of Sunderland and Middlesbrough.

It was also felt that not enough of a case had been put forward for the necessity of the Assembly, and it was feared that it would add another layer of politicians and public servants, thereby increasing taxes for the citizens of the areas affected.

The related votes in Northumberland and County Durham on local government changes became moot, though new single merged unitary authorities were later established based on the county council areas (i.e. Option A in each case) as part of the 2009 structural changes to local government in England.

Following the rejection of the proposal in the north east of England the Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott at the time, ruled out holding further referendums in other regions for the foreseeable future.

After the result in North East England the planned referendum for the region was postponed indefinitely and was never put before the electorate.

Then Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott , the key proponent of the proposed assembly plans
The counties and unitary authorities of England , if "yes" and option 2 is chosen in all referendums.