2014 Maryland Senate election

The Democratic Party had held majority control of the Senate since the beginning of the 20th century.

The closest that the Republican Party had come to gaining control since then was in 1918, when Democrats held a thin 14 to 13 majority.

In the 2014 elections, Governor Martin O'Malley was term-limited and Republicans sought to succeed him with businessman Larry Hogan.

Capitalizing on a national red wave, the party successfully retook the governor's office and picked up nine seats in the General Assembly, including two seats in the Maryland Senate.

Despite these gains, Democrats still retained their veto-proof supermajorities in both chambers of the Maryland General Assembly.

Results by precinct
Young
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Stottlemyer
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • >90%
Tie
Results by precinct
Hough
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Rupli
  • >90%
Results by precinct
Getty
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Results by precinct
Salling
  • 40–50%
  • 50–60%
Olszewski
  • 40–50%
  • 50–60%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Results by precinct
Jennings
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Results by precinct
Klausmeier
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Lofstad
  • 50–60%
Tie
Results by precinct
Bates
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Frederic
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Tie
Results by precinct
Kasemeyer
  • 40–50%
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Pippy
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Results by precinct
Guzzone
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Venkatesan
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Results by precinct
Montgomery
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Howard
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Tie
Results by precinct
Feldman
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Ficker
  • 50–60%
Results by precinct
Lee
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Marks
  • 50–60%
Results by precinct
Kagan
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • >90%
Results by precinct
Manno
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Gonzalez
  • 50–60%
Tie
Results by precinct
Pinsky
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Tie
Results by precinct
Currie
  • 50–60%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Results by precinct
Muse
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Tie
Results by precinct
Miller
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Peed
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Tie
Results by precinct
Middleton
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Donnelly
  • 50–60%
Tie
Results by precinct
Waugh
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Dyson
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Tie
Results by precinct
Astle
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Quinn
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
Tie
Results by precinct
Simonaire
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Harman
  • 50–60%
Results by precinct
DeGrange
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Barber
  • 50–60%
Results by precinct
Cassilly
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
James
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Tie
Results by precinct
Norman
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Results by precinct
Hershey
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Tilghman
  • 50–60%
Results by precinct
Eckardt
  • 40–50%
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Robinson
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Tie
Results by precinct
Mathias
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
McDermott
  • 40–50%
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Tie
Results by precinct
Brochin
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
Robinson
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
Tie
Results by precinct
Nathan-Pulliam
  • 50–60%
  • 60–70%
  • 70–80%
  • 80–90%
  • >90%
Reiter
  • 50–60%