A v Home Secretary (No 2)

Information obtained through torture of terrorist suspects by US armed forces and passed to UK officials had been presented to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission as part of the Crown's case to justify the indefinite detention in HMP Belmarsh of individuals suspected of offences related to terrorism.

"Ten men were certified by the Secretary of State as suspected international terrorists and were detained in the Belmarsh prison in London.

"[1] -pulled from the summary of the basis for the case rendered by the International Crimes Database.

That combined with the fact that torture was used as an information transfer technique, a method outlawed in the United Kingdom, made the crown's justification for imprisoning the men very flimsy.

The House of Lords held that evidence obtained or likely obtained by torture committed abroad by a foreign state’s agents is inadmissible in proceedings before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission.