Amerada Hess Corp. v. Division of Taxation, 490 U.S. 66 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, when determining how much business a corporation has done in a state for tax purposes, the Dormant Commerce Clause requires only that the formula be rational.

[1][2]

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.

You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.