Banister v. Davis, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion to alter or amend a habeas court’s judgment is not a second or successive habeas petition under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.

[1][2] This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court.

As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.

You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.