The unreduced Burau representation has a similar definition, namely one replaces Dn with its (real, oriented) blow-up at the marked points.
Then the unreduced Burau representation may be given explicitly by mapping for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, where Ik denotes the k × k identity matrix.
The first nonfaithful Burau representations were found by John A. Moody without the use of computer, using a notion of winding number or contour integration.
[3] A more conceptual understanding, due to Darren D. Long and Mark Paton[4] interprets the linking or winding as coming from Poincaré duality in first homology relative to the basepoint of a covering space, and uses the intersection form (traditionally called Squier's Form as Craig Squier was the first to explore its properties).
[5] Stephen Bigelow combined computer techniques and the Long–Paton theorem to show that the Burau representation is not faithful for n ≥ 5.
[5] Moreover, when the variable t is chosen to be a transcendental unit complex number near 1, it is a positive-definite Hermitian pairing.