Civic Square (Hong Kong)

It was occupied for a rally opposing the moral and national education school curriculum proposal in August 2012, and during the 2014 Hong Kong protests (Umbrella Revolution) in September 2014.

[6] Scholarism initiated a number of activities, such as Street Station, processions, signatory, rallies and hunger strikes in order to requires the Government to withdraw the Moral and national education.

On 30 August 2012, some Scholarism members and students occupied the Central Government Offices roundabout (Civil Square).

The number of people at the gatherings and meeting increased dramatically and reached a peak in the evening of 7 September 2012 .The Assembly said that more than 120 thousand people joined rallies in Civil Square, Tamar Park, Tim Mei Avenue,[8] but police estimated that there were 30,006 participants.

Protesters blocked both east–west arterial routes in northern Hong Kong Island near Admiralty and occupying Causeway Bay and Mong Kok.

It was introduced because of 1 September Civil Human Rights Front in response to strong public dissatisfaction with the NPCSC stimulate political reform in Hong Kong 2016,2017 resolution,[13] initiated a "power to the people, the implementation of universal suffrage" Yellow Ribbon action.

Hysan Place's management company Hennessy Road will be closed with iron railings front entrance.

Over 20 Nathan Road, Mong Kok section size of jewellery shops closed down, which goldsmith retail chain stores to close a third of the territory of Chow Tai Fook, Nathan Road, Mong Kok, only the affected stores has reached 10.

On 22 October 2014, Chief Secretary Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor responded on the issue of Civil Square.

She claimed that forecourt was used as a vehicular access for the Central Government Offices, and it opened for public use on weekdays mainly as a passageway.

[16] On 3 November, Felix Chung, the new chieftain of Liberal Party said that he hopes the government can open the civil square free to public.

[17] The media filed an application for judicial review court to challenge administrative Director of "drop gate" decision.