Coherent duality

In mathematics, coherent duality is any of a number of generalisations of Serre duality, applying to coherent sheaves, in algebraic geometry and complex manifold theory, as well as some aspects of commutative algebra that are part of the 'local' theory.

The historical roots of the theory lie in the idea of the adjoint linear system of a linear system of divisors in classical algebraic geometry.

This was re-expressed, with the advent of sheaf theory, in a way that made an analogy with Poincaré duality more apparent.

Then according to a general principle, Grothendieck's relative point of view, the theory of Jean-Pierre Serre was extended to a proper morphism; Serre duality was recovered as the case of the morphism of a non-singular projective variety (or complete variety) to a point.

The resulting theory is now sometimes called Serre–Grothendieck–Verdier duality, and is a basic tool in algebraic geometry.

A treatment of this theory, Residues and Duality (1966) by Robin Hartshorne, became a reference.

To go beyond proper morphisms, as for the versions of Poincaré duality that are not for closed manifolds, requires some version of the compact support concept.

The Greenlees–May duality, first formulated in 1976 by Ralf Strebel and in 1978 by Eben Matlis, is part of the continuing consideration of this area.

While Serre duality uses a line bundle or invertible sheaf as a dualizing sheaf, the general theory (it turns out) cannot be quite so simple.

(More precisely, it can, but at the cost of imposing the Gorenstein ring condition.)

In a characteristic turn, Grothendieck reformulated general coherent duality as the existence of a right adjoint functor

, called twisted or exceptional inverse image functor, to a higher direct image with compact support functor

Higher direct images are a sheafified form of sheaf cohomology in this case with proper (compact) support; they are bundled up into a single functor by means of the derived category formulation of homological algebra (introduced with this case in mind).

is a right adjoint to the inverse image functor

The existence theorem for the twisted inverse image is the name given to the proof of the existence for what would be the counit for the comonad of the sought-for adjunction, namely a natural transformation which is denoted by

It is the aspect of the theory closest to the classical meaning, as the notation suggests, that duality is defined by integration.

exists as an exact functor from a derived category of quasi-coherent sheaves on

, whenever is a proper or quasi projective morphism of noetherian schemes, of finite Krull dimension.

[1] From this the rest of the theory can be derived: dualizing complexes pull back via

, the Grothendieck residue symbol, the dualizing sheaf in the Cohen–Macaulay case.

In order to get a statement in more classical language, but still wider than Serre duality, Hartshorne (Algebraic Geometry) uses the Ext functor of sheaves; this is a kind of stepping stone to the derived category.

The classical statement of Grothendieck duality for a projective or proper morphism

of noetherian schemes of finite dimension, found in Hartshorne (Residues and duality) is the following quasi-isomorphism for

One quite recent successful approach is based on the notion of a rigid dualizing complex.

This notion was first defined by Van den Bergh in a noncommutative context.

If such a rigid dualizing complex exists, then it is unique in a strong sense.

is a regular noetherian ring of finite Krull dimension, and by Avramov, Iyengar and Lipman[6] assuming

is a Gorenstein ring of finite Krull dimension and

, one can glue the rigid dualizing complexes that its affine pieces have,[7] and obtain a rigid dualizing complex

Once one establishes a global existence of a rigid dualizing complex, given a map