Comodule over a Hopf algebroid

In mathematics, at the intersection of algebraic topology and algebraic geometry, there is the notion of a Hopf algebroid which encodes the information of a presheaf of groupoids whose object sheaf and arrow sheaf are represented by algebras.

Because any such presheaf will have an associated site, we can consider quasi-coherent sheaves on the site, giving a topos-theoretic notion of modules.

Dually[1]pg 2, comodules over a Hopf algebroid are the purely algebraic analogue of this construction, giving a purely algebraic description of quasi-coherent sheaves on a stack: this is one of the first motivations behind the theory.

Given a commutative Hopf-algebroid

a left comodule

[2]pg 302 is a left

which satisfies the following two properties

A right comodule is defined similarly, but instead there is a map

satisfying analogous axioms.

One of the main structure theorems for comodules[2]pg 303 is if

-module, then the category of comodules

of the Hopf-algebroid is an abelian category.

There is a structure theorem[1] pg 7 relating comodules of Hopf-algebroids and modules of presheaves of groupoids.

is a Hopf-algebroid, there is an equivalence between the category of comodules

and the category of quasi-coherent sheaves

Spec

{\displaystyle {\text{QCoh}}({\text{Spec}}(A),{\text{Spec}}(\Gamma ))}

for the associated presheaf of groupoids

Associated to the Brown-Peterson spectrum is the Hopf-algebroid

classifying p-typical formal group laws.

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}BP_{*}&=\mathbb {Z} _{(p)}[v_{1},v_{2},\ldots ]\\BP_{*}(BP)&=BP_{*}[t_{1},t_{2},\ldots ]\end{aligned}}}

by the prime ideal

denote the ideal

There is a structure theorem on the Adams-Novikov spectral sequence relating the Ext-groups of comodules on

to Johnson-Wilson homology, giving a more tractable spectral sequence.

This happens through an equivalence of categories of comodules of

to the category of comodules of

giving the isomorphism

{\displaystyle {\text{Ext}}_{BP_{*}BP}^{*,*}(M,N)\cong {\text{Ext}}_{E(m)_{*}E(m)}^{*,*}(E(m)_{*}\otimes _{BP_{*}}M,E(m)_{*}\otimes _{BP_{*}}N)}

satisfy some technical hypotheses[1] pg 24.