Coverage error

[3] For example, a researcher may wish to study the opinions of registered voters (target population) by calling residences listed in a telephone directory (sampling frame).

Bias could also occur if some phone numbers listed in the directory do not belong to registered voters.

[5] For example, suppose a researcher is using Twitter to determine the opinion of U.S. voters on a recent action taken by the U.S. President.

[6] For example, a researcher might want to study the relationship between the letter grades received by third graders in a particular school district and the wages that these same children earn when they become adults.

In this case, the researcher is interested in all third graders in the district who grow-up to be adults (target population).

[8] One way to reduce coverage error is to rely on multiple sources to either build a sample frame or to solicit information.

This approach had the added benefit of cost reduction as the majority of people responded by mail and did not require a field visit.

Coverage errors in the U.S. Census have the potential impact of allowing people groups to be underrepresented by the government.

Although the efforts of the CFU and FV improved the 2010 Census accuracy, more study was recommended to address the question of differential undercounts.

All colored circles are included in the target population. Green and Orange colored circles are included in the sample frame. Green colored circles are a randomly generated sample from the sample frame.  The sample frame includes overcoverage because John and Jack are the same person, but he is included more than once in the sample frame.  The sample frame includes undercoverage because not all of the target population is included in the sample frame.