Darby v. Cisneros, 509 U.S. 137 (1993), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that federal courts cannot require that a plaintiff exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking judicial review when exhaustion of remedies is not required by either administrative rules or statute.

R. Gordon Darby, a real estate developer in South Carolina, was banned from participating in Department of Housing and Urban Development programs for 18 months.

He and others filed in federal court even though they had not exhausted the internal HUD review process.

Henry Cisneros, as HUD Secretary, was the respondent.

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.