[2] Yilma, on the other hand, presents Digital Constitutionalism as a collective label for a series of uncoordinated, sporadic and multilevel initiatives that seek to re-imagine age-old human rights and principles to a new age heralded by the Internet and allied technologies.
Celeste believes that future actors should start analysing and comparing the different forms through which the process of constitutionalisation of the digital environment is taking place, especially in the hope of better understanding the reasons why constitutional responses are materialising in non-traditional contexts outside the state-centric dimension.
Redeker, Gill and Gasser define Digital Constitutionalism as an "umbrella term" to connect a set of documents seeking to establish a Bill of Rights for the internet.
[6] Celeste proposes a multilevel theory that sees the simultaneous emergence of a plurality of normative responses that seek to address the challenges that the digital revolution generates in the constitutional ecosystem.
[7] A key issue within digital constitutionalisation is the role of private actors in this form of governance, particularly through enabling or disabling user’s rights.
Suzor’s theory of Digital Constitutionalism seeks to identify positive governance methods and limit the online power of both the state and private actors appropriately.