Disintegration theorem

In mathematics, the disintegration theorem is a result in measure theory and probability theory.

It rigorously defines the idea of a non-trivial "restriction" of a measure to a measure zero subset of the measure space in question.

It is related to the existence of conditional probability measures.

In a sense, "disintegration" is the opposite process to the construction of a product measure.

Consider the unit square

by the restriction of two-dimensional Lebesgue measure

That is, the probability of an event

is simply the area of

-null set; since the Lebesgue measure space is a complete measure space,

While true, this is somewhat unsatisfying.

is the one-dimensional Lebesgue measure

The probability of a "two-dimensional" event

could then be obtained as an integral of the one-dimensional probabilities of the vertical "slices"

denotes one-dimensional Lebesgue measure on

The disintegration theorem makes this argument rigorous in the context of measures on metric spaces.

will denote the collection of Borel probability measures on a topological space

The assumptions of the theorem are as follows: The conclusion of the theorem: There exists a

-almost everywhere uniquely determined family of probability measures

, such that: The original example was a special case of the problem of product spaces, to which the disintegration theorem applies.

is written as a Cartesian product

is the natural projection, then each fibre

can be canonically identified with

and there exists a Borel family of probability measures

The relation to conditional expectation is given by the identities

The disintegration theorem can also be seen as justifying the use of a "restricted" measure in vector calculus.

For instance, in Stokes' theorem as applied to a vector field flowing through a compact surface

, it is implicit that the "correct" measure on

is the disintegration of three-dimensional Lebesgue measure

[2] The disintegration theorem can be applied to give a rigorous treatment of conditional probability distributions in statistics, while avoiding purely abstract formulations of conditional probability.

[3] The theorem is related to the Borel–Kolmogorov paradox, for example.