The author’s categorical disagreement with current endeavors to bring together special divine action (SDA) with quantum assumptions and chaos theory is reflected in the book, saying that people are still remotely far from a reasonable hypothesis of divine action in a world that is consonant with contemporary science.

Nonetheless, Saunders presumes that God exists and is currently active in the world in a specific sense setting off new fundamental interactions in nature.

"[2] Saunders also drew from several theories on Divine Action such as those put forward by thinkers William Pollard, Nancey Murphy, and Thomas Tracy, among others.

In his discourse, the author – through the evidence provided by these scholars – concluded that for each Divine action, there is a scientific feasibility.

[3] Ultimately, the book claimed that a scientific explanation of the Divine action could revolutionize theological traditions, making it more relevant and tenable in light of our modern understanding of the natural sciences.