[3] Wrong discusses the reasons why Rwanda's regime has maintained close relations with the international community and aid donors, arguing that acceptance of strongmen to keep Africans in order is a form of racism.

"[3] In The Times, Ian Birrell called the book an "absorbing Shakespearean saga" and says that Wrong "exposes a more complex" narrative than conventional depictions of Rwanda, "showing the savagery that lies beneath the surface of a regime hailed by many Western admirers".

[9] In The New York Times, Howard W. French stated that the book is "perhaps the most ambitious attempt yet to tell the dark story of Rwanda and the region’s deeply intertwined tragedies for a general audience".

[1] A Financial Times article written by Alec Russell says that Do Not Disturb is "a remarkable, chilling and long overdue book" and "an extraordinarily brave piece of reporting" that will prompt reassessment of the Rwandan government.

[12] The Washington Post says Wrong, "knits all these critiques together in a way that is comprehensive and compelling — built around the Cain and Abel tale of two soul brothers who achieve political power only to be torn apart by jealousy and pride".

[13] Former British diplomat Edward Clay says that Wrong's research is thorough and she explored under-explored incidents in Rwanda's history, leading to "fascinating insights into some of the mysteries that have remained unexplained for the last 26 years".

[17] France's Marianne magazine said the book was "remarkably written", "as much an account of the insane ambition of a man and his followers as a manual of political anthropology allowing a better understanding of the reasons, both deep and superficial, for the Rwandan tragedy.