English Language Unity Act

If enacted it would require that all official functions and proceedings of federal and state government be conducted in English.

It would also require that applicants for naturalization be tested on their ability to read and generally understand the English language.

[4] Representative King alongside Senator Jim Inhofe introduced the English Language Unity Act of 2011 on Friday, March 10, 2011.

While appearing to focus solely on language, these attempts trigger issues related to financial burden, discrimination, patriotism, and unity.

They claim Congress does not need to establish legislation in order to teach others the importance of knowing English since the language is already spoken by a majority of Americans.

Opponents of the legislation question why there is a sudden need for an official language, given that the United States government has flourished without one for the past two hundred years.

They acknowledge that the ability to speak a language other than English is valuable, and that its use in the home, church or private place of business should in no way be discouraged.

They contend that as more immigrants learn English, the language barriers that divide the country into separate groups will disintegrate and lead to a decrease in racial and ethnic problems.

They argue that immigrants who are fluent in English have better economic opportunities, and assert that non-English speakers tend to find themselves restricted to low-skilled, low-paying jobs.

Supporters of the bill also posit that the ability of immigrant groups to speak English will give them an increased political voice and allow them to participate more fully and effectively in the democratic process.