Green Tree Financial Corp.-Ala. v. Randolph

Green Tree Financial Corp-Ala. v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79 (2000), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court.

However, Green Tree Financial Corporation asked the District Court to compel arbitration.

Because the agreement would therefore force Randolph to pay the "steep" arbitration costs,[3] and thus was unfair and invalid.

The majority, in disagreeing, remanded the case back to the Eleventh Circuit with instructions to find the agreement valid under law.

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the original finding that Randolph was forced to go into arbitration.