The original goal of the invited error doctrine was to prohibit a party from setting up an error at trial and then complaining of it on appeal.
[1] In State v. Pam, the State of Washington intentionally set up an error in order to create a test case for appeal.
Since then, the doctrine has been applied even in cases where the error resulted from neither negligence nor bad faith.
Invited error, while inclusive of any active response, does not include acquiescing to an action of the court one has filed an objection to.
Co. (1941) 18 Cal.2d 117 [114 P.2d 343]...) But the doctrine does not apply when a party, while making the appropriate objections, acquiesces in a judicial determination."