Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the attorney general immune to judicial review does not allow the attorney general to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations.

[1][2]

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.

You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.