Legal system of ancient Tamilakam

Maritime contacts Sangam period Tamilakam Cheras Spice trade Ays Ezhil Malai Confluence of religionsMamankam festival Calicut Venad - Kingdom of QuilonValluvanad Kolattunadu CochinArakkal kingdom Minor principalities Age of Discovery Portuguese period Dutch period Rise of Travancore Mysorean invasion British PeriodBattle of TirurangadiMalabar DistrictNorth MalabarSouth Malabar Battle of Quilon Communism in KeralaLakshadweep Economy Architecture

If a monarch failed in the act of aram, it would then bring eternal blame (pali) from their own subjects.

[2] A Pandya king mentions that he should be put into the boiling water for having appointed an unscrupulous person as judge in his court of justice.

[4] Although Aram is normally translated as virtue and equated to the Sanskrit Dharma, and because of the interaction between them it has been impossible to draw a distinction between them.

Persons who administered justice during the Sangam period were governed by the principles of equity embodied in the word, aram.

[10] In the chapter called Chengonmai of Tirukkural, Tiruvalluvar conceptualises that: Government has to examine the crimes, which may be committed to show no favor to anyone, and to inflict such punishment as may be wisely resolved on.

[citation needed] Although the monarch was the supreme arbiter in all civil and criminal cases, the administration of Justice was devolved to Judges.

Justice was administered free of charge to the suitors ; but the punishments were very severe and hence crimes were rare.

A particular method of trial by ordeal was to call upon the plaintiff to thrust his hand into a pot containing a cobra.