Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc., 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Medicare Secondary Payer statute does not authorize disparate-impact liability, and the Marietta Plan’s coverage terms for outpatient dialysis were lawful because those terms applied uniformly to all covered individuals.

[1][2] This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court.

As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.

You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.