[1] The case established that "all children are entitled to free public education and training appropriate to their learning capacities".

[4] These subsections identify a violation of the right to equal treatment under law in a way that would obstruct the ability to protect one's interest as an individual member of a common class.

Additionally, subsection b(2) describes a case with refusal of the opposing party to rectify the transgression to a degree that merits corrective adjudication.

[5] This was a broad interpretation of the 14th Amendment due process clause of law and was used to make changes to local school district policy.

It had failed to provide due process hearings and periodic reviews of each exceptional student case.