Similar to the lottery paradox, it presents an argument according to which it can be rational to accept mutually incompatible beliefs.
(1) Such an author has written a book that contains many assertions, and has factually checked each one carefully, submitted it to reviewers for comment, etc.
In classical deductive logic, a set of statements is inconsistent if it contains a contradiction.
Probabilistic perspective may restate the statements in other terms, thus resolving the paradox by making them non-contradictory.
Finally, paraconsistent logics aims to accept some contradictory statements without exploding.