Propellane

[1][2] The concept was introduced in 1966 by D. Ginsburg [1][3] Propellanes with small cycles are highly strained and unstable, and are easily turned into polymers with interesting structures, such as staffanes.

The IUPAC nomenclature of the homologue series of all-carbon propellanes would be called tricyclo[x.y.z.01,(x+2)]alkane.

The resulting steric strain causes such compounds to be unstable and highly reactive.

The interbridgehead C-C bond is easily broken (even spontaneously) to yield less-strained bicyclic or even monocyclic hydrocarbons.

[6] Studies by Sterling et al. suggest delocalisation effects onto the three-membered bridges relaxing Pauli-repulsion and thus stabilising the propellane core.

Anions and radicals add towards the interbridgehead bond resulting in bicyclo[1.1.1]pentyl-units.

In contrary, cations and metals decompose the tricyclic core towards monocyclic systems by opening of the bridged bonds forming exo-methylene cyclobutanes.

For the propellanes with small cycles (such as [1.1.1], [3.2.1], or 1,3-dihydroadamantane), this process is easily achieved, yielding either simple polymers or alternating copolymers.

Some propellanes. From left to right: [1.1.1]propellane, [2.2.2]propellane, and 1,3-dehydroadamantane (a methylene-bridged derivative of [3.3.1]propellane).
Lewis-Structure of an eneral carbocyclic propellane labelling bridge- and interbridgehead bond with x,y,z counters.
General nomenclature of carbocyclic Propellane.
First line shows addition of radical and anions to [1.1.1]Propellane producing Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane units. It also shows addition of Cations add to the bridgebond of [1.1.1]Propellane. The second line of the figure shows the general reactivity of [3.1.1]Propellane undergoing addition of radicals to produce bicyclo[3.1.1]heptyl-units (no cationic and anionic reactivity reported so far)
General reactivity profile of [1.1.1]Propellane and [3.1.1]Propellane
Synthetic route toward dichrocephone B.