The proportional rule is a division rule for solving bankruptcy problems.
According to this rule, each claimant should receive an amount proportional to their claim.
In the context of taxation, it corresponds to a proportional tax.
[1] There is a certain amount of money to divide, denoted by
(=Estate or Endowment).
Each claimant i has a claim denoted by
, that is, the estate is insufficient to satisfy all the claims.
The proportional rule says that each claimant i should receive
, where r is a constant chosen such that
In other words, each agent gets
Examples with two claimants: Examples with three claimants: The proportional rule has several characterizations.
It is the only rule satisfying the following sets of axioms: There is a variant called truncated-claims proportional rule, in which each claim larger than E is truncated to E, and then the proportional rule is activated.
That is, it equals
{\displaystyle PROP(c_{1}',\ldots ,c_{n}',E)}
:= min (
The results are the same for the two-claimant problems above, but for the three-claimant problems we get: The adjusted proportional rule[8] first gives, to each agent i, their minimal right, which is the amount not claimed by the other agents.
Formally,
Note that
implies
Then, it revises the claim of agent i to
, and the estate to
Note that that
Finally, it activates the truncated-claims proportional rule, that is, it returns
{\displaystyle TPROP(c_{1},\ldots ,c_{n},E')=PROP(c_{1}'',\ldots ,c_{n}'',E')}
:= min (
With two claimants, the revised claims are always equal, so the remainder is divided equally.
Examples: With three or more claimants, the revised claims may be different.
In all the above three-claimant examples, the minimal rights are
and thus the outcome is equal to TPROP, for example,
{\displaystyle APROP(100,200,300;200)=TPROP(100,200,300;200)=(20,40,40)}