Regional integration

In recent years countries within economic-trade regimes such as ASEAN in Southeast Asia for example have increased the level of trade and commodity exchange between themselves which reduces the inflation and tariff barriers associated with foreign markets resulting in growing prosperity.

Regional integration has been defined as the process through which independent national states "voluntarily mingle, merge and mix with their neighbours so as to lose the factual attributes of sovereignty while acquiring new techniques for resolving conflicts among themselves.

[4] Regional integration initiatives, according to Van Langenhove, should fulfill at least eight important functions: The crisis of the post-war order led to a new global political structure.

[citation needed] The concept of sovereignty became looser and the old legal definitions of the ultimate and fully autonomous power of a nation-state are no longer meaningful.

[citation needed] All regional integration projects during the Cold War were built on the Westphalian state system and were designed to serve economic growth as well as security motives in their assistance to state-building goals.

[citation needed] Closer integration of neighbouring economies has often been seen by governments as a first step in creating a larger regional market for trade and investment.

This is claimed to spur greater efficiency, productivity gain and competitiveness, not just by lowering border barriers, but by reducing other costs and risks of trade and investment.

[citation needed] It is also claimed that the members of these arrangements hope that they will succeed as building blocks for progress with a growing range of partners and towards a generally freer and open global environment for trade and investment[citation needed] and that integration is not an end in itself, but a process to support economic growth strategies, greater social equality and democratization.

Also, there is increasing evidence that the forms of regional integration employed by nation-states have actually worsened social inequality and diminished democratic accountability.

[6][2] Regional integration arrangements are a part and parcel of the present global economic order and this trend is now an acknowledged future of the international scene.

However, in the light of the modern context, that debate is being propounded into the clauses of different regional integration agreements arising out of increase in international trade.

The agreements tend to be more forward in their outward approach as well as show commitment in trying to advance international trade and commerce instead to trying to put a cap on it by way of strict control.

However, critics of the forms this integration has taken have consistently pointed out that the forms of regional integration promoted have often been neoliberal in character, in line with the motives and values of the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank - promoting financial deregulation, the removal of barriers to capital and global corporations, their owners and investors; focusing on industrialisation, boosting global trade volumes and increasing GDP.

Advocates of alternative regional integration argue strongly that the solutions to global crises (financial, economic, environmental, climate, energy, health, food, social, etc.)

Stiglitz argues that the deregulation, free trade, and social spending cuts or austerity policies of neoliberal economics have actually created and worsened global crises.

In his 2002 book Globalization and Its Discontents he explains how the industrialized economies of the US, Europe, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan developed not with the neoliberal policies promoted in developing countries and the global South by the WTO, IMF and World Bank, but rather with a careful mix of protection, regulation, social support and intervention from national governments in the market.

PAAR strives to "promote cross-fertilisation of experiences on regional alternatives among social movements and civil society organisations from Asia, Africa, South America and Europe."

Organizations grouping almost all the countries in their respective continents. Note that Russia used to be a member of both the Council of Europe (COE) and the Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD) but now is only part of the Asia Cooperation Dialogue, and Cuba was reinstated as a member of the Organization of American States (OAS) in 2009.
Several smaller regional organizations with non-overlapping memberships.
Several non-overlapping large alliances. Softer colours indicate observer/associate or candidate countries.
Stages of economic integration around the World (each country colored according to the most integrated multilateral agreement that it participates in):
Common market ( EEA –Switzerland )