Wikipedia's open-editing model, which allows any user to edit its encyclopedic pages, has led to concerns such as the quality of writing, the amount of vandalism, and the accuracy of information on the project.
The media have covered controversial events and scandals related to Wikipedia and its funding organization, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF).
The incident dates back to May 2005, with the anonymous posting of a hoax Wikipedia article containing false and negative allegations about John Seigenthaler, a well-known American journalist.
[3][4] The 2012 scandals involving paid consultancy for the government of Gibraltar by Roger Bamkin, a Wikimedia UK board member,[5][6] and potential conflicts of interest have highlighted Wikipedia's vulnerabilities.
[8][9] In 2015, the Orangemoody investigation showed that businesses and minor celebrities had been blackmailed over their Wikipedia articles by a coordinated group of fraudsters, again using hundreds of sockpuppets.
In September 2011, controversy arose when British writer and journalist
Johann Hari
admitted using Wikipedia to attack his opponents by editing the articles about them and inserting fabrications.
[
164
]
[
165
]
Jimmy Wales's relationship to Tony and Cherie Blair came into question in December 2012 amid discussion of their connections with the
Kazakh government
.
Writer
Amanda Filipacchi
wrote an April 2013 op-ed in
The New York Times
criticizing the Wikipedia category "American Women Novelists".
Andrew Leonard
poses in front of a Wikipedia page about him, the creation of which was inspired by his reporting on "revenge editor" Robert Clark Young.
[
236
]
James Heilman's dismissal from the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees exacerbated tensions between the Board and the Wikipedia editing community in December 2015.