Sheriff v. Gillie, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the use of the Ohio Attorney General's letterhead, as its direction, was permissible and not a false, deceptive, or misleading representation under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

[1][2] The Ohio Attorney General contracted out debt collection to private attorneys and instructed them to use the Ohio Attorney General's letterhead.

[2] Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg authored a unanimous decision.

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.

You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.