Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.
Wafflefrites (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] I reverted an addition of a suspected single vote not found to be fraud as far as I can see.
Looks like possibly an error on the part of the student as they attempted to withdraw the vote, and it was ruled that it will count making the charge of fraud even less likely.
Fabrickator (talk) 02:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] Vote flipping (touch screens changing the voter's intended candidate) has been a common claim since 2004, and I felt it deserved mention here.
Gowser (talk) 15:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] There was voting fraud in a Sad Sack Story, "Senator Sack," that was shown me years ago by a boy who was my cabmate for two years when I was a student at a school called the Ottawa Child Study Centre.