[2] Laura Wilson in The Guardian[3] said "The Year of the Locust starts promisingly with vivid descriptions, some terrific action sequences and lashings of suspense, there is plenty to entertain and distract you while you drum your fingers.
But around three-quarters of the way through and with no prior warning, the plot takes a sideways leap and lands in an entirely different genre, which may leave you not so much intrigued as utterly bewildered."
James Owen in The Times[4] was also positive on the start: "within a few pages you are reminded how capably Hayes, the screenwriter of films such as Mad Max 2, sketches the canvas of remote Kiplingesque locales through which Walker and his ponies trot in the dark" and is more forgiving of the major plot twist: "my view is that Hayes has just built up enough credit... to carry us through".
Sue Turnbull in The Sydney Morning Herald[5] calls The Year of the Locust 'the most monumental spy thriller of the new millennium.
As in this description of Jim, the head of analysis in the CIA war room, “a hard-driving forty-year-old with a face so rugged it looked like a long stretch of torn-up road”.