This experiment also pointed out that there are certain variables to consider when looking at TAP because they greatly limit the effectiveness of the retrieval and encoding processes.
[2] In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart completed studies that went against the idea of multistore theories and were in favor of levels of processing when it comes to the human memory.
Craik and Lockhart explained that the theory of multistore had very little evidence when it came to capacity, coding and retention.
Craik and Lockhart completed 10 experiments where participants processed different words by answering questions about them.
They believe that much of the questionability of the processing effects lies between the encoding specificity principle and TAP.
Roediger and Gallo argue that after 30 years of research, they still cannot identify why or how we get the typical levels-of-processing effect.
This means the rabbit would excel at surviving because it has a wider range of flexible qualities.
Of course it could be argued that there would be certain areas that the koala would thrive in, but they are not as numerous as the survival qualities of the rabbit.