United States v. Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that lying to an investigator is not obstruction of justice merely because the investigator would then testify before a grand jury; the accused must specifically intend to influence such proceedings directly.

[1] Additionally, the Court announced that a federal district court judge does not have a First Amendment right to disclose that a suspect's phone has been wiretapped.

[2]

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub.

You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.